A 2024 U.S. Senate candidate allegedly acquired zero votes in a number of Rockland County districts—regardless of a number of voters swearing they picked her. Now, a brand new lawsuit is placing that obvious discrepancy below the authorized microscope, elevating deeper questions in regards to the integrity of the 2024 presidential election and Donald Trump’s licensed win.
SMART Laws, the authorized arm of nonpartisan group SMART Elections, filed a lawsuit after uncovering what they name statistically unlikely outcomes and voter affidavits that don’t match the licensed totals. The group’s founder, Lulu Friesdat, argues that the licensed Senate outcomes are provably flawed and says the presidential outcomes additionally increase pink flags.
The inconsistencies embody districts the place lots of voted for Senate Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand, however not a single vote registered for Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate. The lawsuit additionally leans on knowledge evaluation from College of Alabama professor Max Bonamente, who famous that the vote patterns in 4 out of 5 Rockland County cities had been statistically inconceivable when in comparison with 2020 outcomes.
Despite the fact that the 2024 election is licensed and Trump is formally president once more, this lawsuit is demanding a full hand recount of all Senate and presidential ballots in Rockland County. A choose agreed the claims had been critical sufficient for discovery to proceed. A court docket listening to is scheduled for September 22.
Whereas authorized specialists say the anomalies aren’t sufficient to flip the state’s outcomes, they imagine investigating such inconsistencies is vital to sustaining election integrity. Critics argue this might re-stoke controversy round Trump’s win, particularly with ongoing considerations in regards to the ES&S voting machines utilized in 40 p.c of U.S. counties.
And with the Professional V&V lab—which permitted last-minute software program adjustments earlier than the election—allegedly going silent post-election, transparency advocates say public confidence is on the road.
Backside line: the numbers aren’t including up, and now the courts are concerned.
Uncover extra from Baller Alert
Subscribe to get the newest posts despatched to your electronic mail.
