Jay-Z and his authorized crew try each tactic within the e-book to get the rape case in opposition to him thrown out.
Supply: Gilbert Flores / Getty
In response to studies from Deadline, the Roc Nation head’s lawyer, Alex Spiro, filed new paperwork in relation to the continued rape case on Monday, December 30. His authorized crew seeks to problem the lawsuit accusing Jay-Z of rape, claiming the alleged assault is claimed to have taken place months earlier than a December 2000 regulation providing civil recourse for victims of gender-motivated violence got here into impact.
This comes only a few days after a New York-based federal choose refused the rapper’s efforts to have claims that he and Sean “Diddy” Combs sexually assaulted a 13-year-old dismissed and the Jane Doe plaintiff unmasked. Since their efforts to get the case tossed have failed as soon as, Jay-Z and his authorized crew try to make use of the calendar and geography to assist them get the lawsuit tossed out.
“Plaintiff can not get well for her sole declare below the Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Safety Act (the GMV Regulation), as a matter of regulation, as a result of the statute doesn’t have retroactive impact,” Spiro wrote in a letter to Decide Analisa Torres on Monday in line with Deadline. “Plaintiff asserts a violation of the GMV Regulation for conduct that purportedly occurred in September 2000. However the GMV Regulation was not enacted till December 19, 2000, three months after the FAC claims the conduct occurred, and can’t apply retroactively to create a reason for motion unavailable to Plaintiff on the time in query.”
Spiro and Jay-Z are doubling down on the timeline facet of their argument, insisting that Jane Doe’s capability to take authorized motion “expired no later than August 2021.”
Referencing a now-dismissed sexual assault case from a minor that Aerosmith singer Steven Tyler was hit with in late 2023, Jay-Z’s authorized crew asserts that “any viable GMV Regulation declare is time-barred below New York’s Youngster Victims Act (CVA), which preempts Plaintiff’s GMV Regulation declare.” Noting the CVA really was amended in 2019 with an addition 30 months, “the Courts on this District, nevertheless, have acknowledged that the CVA’s revival interval preempts the GMV Regulation’s overlapping and prolonged one.”
The lawsuit in query, which was filed earlier this month, comes from Jane Doe, claiming she was raped by each Jay-Z and Diddy at an MTV Video Music Awards afterparty in 2000 when she was 13. Each rappers have denied the allegations.
Final week, in courtroom paperwork obtained by TMZ, Decide Torres dominated that Jane Doe can stay unnamed after Jay-Z’s lawyer filed to have the case dismissed and Doe’s id revealed. Nevertheless, the choose famous the circumstances may change because the case strikes ahead, meaning to revisit the difficulty if and when the case progresses.
Jay-Z’s authorized crew is attempting every little thing they will to maintain that from taking place.
