Jay-Z’s nameless rape accuser simply requested a choose to throw out his defamation lawsuit in opposition to her.
She claims Jay-Z can’t sue her as a result of her unique accusations had been made in court docket filings protected by regulation. She additionally says her NBC interview was primarily based solely on these filings.
This all began when she accused Jay-Z and Diddy of raping her when she was 13. However after inconsistencies popped up, she dropped her case. Jay-Z then sued her and her lawyer, Tony Buzbee, for defamation, saying they broken his identify with false claims.
Now she’s saying the lawsuit shouldn’t even exist.
Buzbee claims, “An settlement to resolve the litigation was reached… which included the voluntary dismissal of the SDNY Motion.”
Jay-Z’s lawyer, Alex Spiro, isn’t having it. He responded, “Complete lie. He introduced a false case, misplaced badly and was compelled to dismiss rapidly. Finish of story.”
However Buzbee’s legal professional stated, “Spiro’s assertion that there was no settlement is a complete fabrication. There was an trade of emails… which set forth the settlement very clearly.”
He added, “We agreed to withdraw the lawsuit… regardless that Jane Doe continued to take care of that the allegations in that lawsuit had been true… Jay Z and Spiro agreed to not ship any extra individuals to harass and intimidate Jane Doe and her household.”
Jay-Z’s group hasn’t formally responded to the girl’s movement but.
Uncover extra from Baller Alert
Subscribe to get the most recent posts despatched to your e mail.
