The web lit up with backlash after Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna floated the concept that Melania Trump must be thought of for a Nobel Peace Prize alongside her husband.
Social media customers didn’t maintain again, flooding timelines with sharp critiques and side-eyes over what many noticed as a wild stretch. Many pointed to the primary woman’s low profile and minimal public work as first woman, sparking a broader debate about who will get world reward and what really counts as significant diplomatic impression.
Luna’s controversial remarks got here throughout a Friday evening Fox Information look with host Charlie Harm, the place she enthusiastically championed each Trumps for the distinguished worldwide honor.
The Florida congresswoman claimed Melania Trump might assist dealer peace, citing a letter the primary woman despatched to Russia’s chief. However critics be aware the letter prevented saying “Ukraine” or “Ukrainian,” elevating questions on her grasp of the battle and whether or not she must be concerned in any respect.
‘Hahahahahaha’: Gavin Newsom’s Mockery of Donald Trump Simply Escalated, Now His Spouse Melania Has Grow to be the Punchline
The general public backlash was swift and harsh.
One pissed off X person declared, “Hell will freeze over first earlier than Trump or Melania will get a Nobel Peace Prize!!!”
The criticism grew sharper as one other individual wrote, “Nobel Prize? She couldn’t even win a spelling bee with out stealing Michelle Obama’s solutions.”
MAGA Rep. Anna Paulina Luna says Melania Trump ought to get a Nobel Peace Prize as a result of “she’s been very instrumental in discussions with Russia.”🤡🤡🤡 pic.twitter.com/WUgpRjt2tL
— Republicans in opposition to Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) August 30, 2025
The reference to plagiarism allegations from Melania’s 2016 Republican Nationwide Conference speech added one other layer to the mounting skepticism.
Extra voices joined the refrain of disapproval, with one significantly detailed response studying, “Melania Trump doesn’t deserve a Nobel Peace Prize as probably the most ineffective First Girl in historical past who ruined the Rose Backyard, shunned migrant kids together with her notorious jacket, posed for images, and solely cares about her personal son, whereas her ineffective and certain plagiarized letter; as an alternative, honor Michelle Obama and Jill Biden who labored tirelessly for the American individuals.”
As a result of Melania Trump is trending, it’s my civic obligation to repost the time the worst First Girl in historical past plagiarized Michelle Obama’s speech virtually phrase for phrase. pic.twitter.com/tdr9BGAbXo
— Canada Hates Trump (@AntiTrumpCanada) September 26, 2024
One other critic bluntly acknowledged, “The Trump’s purchase all the pieces they need, neither one have attained something for the Nobel Peace Prize. Even to recommend is insane. Melania has executed nothing.”
Whereas the Melania suggestion stays unofficial, Donald Trump has certainly obtained a number of official nominations for the coveted prize from varied worldwide sources.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly supported Trump’s nomination, whereas governments from different nations have indicated their intention to appoint him for varied diplomatic efforts. (Nominations for this yr’s prize closed on Jan. 31, and there are 338 candidates for the consideration this yr.)
Trump’s pursuit of the Nobel Peace Prize takes on added significance when considered by means of his sophisticated relationship with Barack Obama.
Obama’s 2009 award, granted simply eight months into his presidency, has lengthy been a supply of irritation for Trump, who spent years selling conspiracy theories about Obama’s birthplace and legitimacy as president. The birther motion, which Trump championed persistently, revealed deep-seated animus towards Obama that continues to affect Trump’s political calculations.
Along with Obama, solely three different American presidents have obtained the Nobel Peace Prize: Theodore Roosevelt in 1906, Woodrow Wilson in 1919, and Jimmy Carter in 2002. No American first woman has ever been acknowledged with the consideration, making Luna’s suggestion traditionally unprecedented.
This sample of aggressive rhetoric raises questions in regards to the disconnect between looking for recognition for peace efforts whereas utilizing language that many interpret as threatening or intimidating towards political opponents.
The controversy over Melania Trump’s potential Nobel Peace Prize nomination is stirring questions on benefit, achievement, and political posturing in America. Supporters spotlight symbolic gestures, however critics ask the laborious query: “What precisely has she completed?”
Because the world waits for the Oct. 10 announcement, curiosity grows over whether or not a Trump win would reshape perceptions of this traditionally prestigious award.
